Cortazar, Julio
Please post your comments and suggestions for this article.
Please post your comments and suggestions for this article.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response.
There is a mistake at the beginning of this article: “[Cortazar] is considered to be one of the most important authors in the history of South American magic realism”. This is incorrect.
Cortazar considered himself to be a writer of the “fantastic”, as opposed to being an exponent of “magic realism”. While Cortazar and GarcÃa Márquez knew each other personally, Cortazar´s short stories differ significantly from those of GarcÃa Márquez. While “magic realism” requires that the reader “accept” the unreal as matter of fact, Cortazar subtly leads the reader into the unreal, so as to produce an element of surprise, of something quite unexpected.
“Magic realism” requires a story grounded in the “real” world where impossible events take place. The story is written in such a way as to lead the reader to accept the “impossible” in the story. It works as a fairy tale, were the reader is not taken by surprise. The impossible is taken by granted.
The “fantastic” also requires elements of reality, but, quite the opposite from “magic realism”, the reader is taken by surprise when the fantastic takes place.
I hope this explanation is clear!
Thanks,
Marcelo 🙂