Sigmund Freud
Please post your comments and suggestions for this article.
Leave a Reply
Sigmund Freud
Please post your comments and suggestions for this article.
Comment by Lauren Jackson on November 30th, 2010 at 9:03 pm
Hi!
My name is Lauren Jackson and I wanted to provide feedback on your page, http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Sigmund_Freud. I’m not sure if you’re the right person to contact, but I wanted to tell you that since I have been working on creating some new resources about Sigmund Freud, your page was a great source of information.
As a thank you, I thought I would pass along this additional resource I have been using as well in case you were looking to add more to your page. I have been using material from this page, http://www.psychologydegreeonline.com/freudian-resources. It has a ton of great information about Freud that you and your users may find useful!
Thanks Again 🙂
Lauren
Comment by Jennifer Tanabe on December 1st, 2010 at 12:49 pm
Thank you Lauren for your feedback. I will check out the resource you suggested. Thank you again for helping to make NWE an increasingly valuable resource.
Comment by José Manuel Fernández Santana on September 10th, 2012 at 4:23 pm
The article is biased, partial, ridiculous, conventional and hilarious.
It is also archaic: the kind of antiFreudian criticism that Catholics started ​​a century ago. For a modern consideration of Freud´s ideas
I recommend reading “In Praise of Psychoanalysis”, Ed Dunken, Argentina, 2010.
Comment by Jennifer Tanabe on September 17th, 2012 at 6:35 pm
Thank you for your feedback. Unfortunately I was unable to locate the book you suggested.
You criticize the article as “archaic” and anti-Freudian. In fact, reference is made to the work of Peter Gay whose “Freud: A Life for Our Time” is both modern and pro-Freud, as well as numerous other scholarly works that recognize the value of Freud’s work.
Leave a Reply
