Mencius

Mencius
Ancestral name (姓):	Ji (Chinese: 姬 ; Pinyin: Jī)
Clan name (氏):	Meng¹ (Ch: 孟 ; Py: Mèng)
Given name (名):	Ke (Ch: 軻 ; Py: Kē)
Posthumous name (謚):	Master Meng the Second Sage²
	(Ch: 亞聖孟子 ; Py: Yàshèng Mèngzǐ)
Styled:	Master Meng 3
	(Ch: 孟子; Py: Mèngzǐ)
1 The original clan name was Mengsun (孟孫), but was shortened into Meng (孟), before or after Mencius's life, it is not possible to say.
2 That is, the second sage after Confucius. Name given in 1530 by Emperor Jiajing. In the two centuries before 1530, the posthumous name was "The Second Sage Duke of Zou" (鄒國亞聖公) which is still the name that can be seen carved in the Mencius ancestral temple in Zoucheng.
3Romanized as Mencius.

Mencius (Chinese 孟子, transliterated Meng Zi, most accepted dates: 371 – 289 B.C.E.; other possible dates: 385 – 303/302 B.C.E.) was a Chinese philosopher and follower of Confucianism who argued that humans are naturally moral beings but are corrupted by society.

In the history of Confucianism, he is second only to Confucius in terms of his influence, as he was the primary proponent (and systematizer) of Confucian thought and values in the century following the Sage's death. His vision was accepted as the orthodox transmission of the Confucian Dao by the Neo-Confucians, earning him a place of primacy from the eighth century C.E. to the present day. He is often compared to Plato, as both were systematic thinkers who transmitted their sagely idol's teachings through dialogues.

Biography

Mencius, also known by his birth name Meng Ke or Ko, was born in the State of Zou (鄒國), only thirty kilometres south of Qufu, Confucius' birthplace. He was an itinerant Chinese philosopher and sage, and one of the principal interpreters of Confucianism. Though he never studied directly with Confucius, he "studied under the pupils of Confucius's grandson [Zisi]." His subsequent philosophical career was marked by numerous debates with other schools of philosophy, particularly the Mohists and followers of Yang Zhu. Additionally, he (like Confucius) travelled around China for forty years, visiting various royal courts and offering the rulers advice on how to reform their kingdoms, culminating in a seven year stint as an official in the State of Qi (齊 qì) from 319 to 312 B.C.E. In another parallel with popular accounts of the life of Confucius, Mencius is known for expressing his filial devotion by taking an absence of three years (from his official duties for Qi) to mourn his mother's death. Finally, disappointed at his failure to effect changes in his contemporary world, he retired from public life. Over and above these scanty details, Mencius remains a highly enigmatic figure, in so far that "we know practically nothing about Mencius' family or his private life"

The teachings of Mencius have been preserved in an eponymous text, the Mencius (also spelled Mengzi or Meng-tzu). This book, likely compiled in the years following his death, contains transcriptions (or more likely recollections) of his teaching sessions, philosophical debates and conversations with kings. In contrast with the Analects of Confucius (Lunyu), which is comprised of short, rather epigrammatic phrases, much of the Mencius consists of long dialogues, written in prose and using many analogies and stories to illuminate his points.

Philosophy

Background

The only surviving records of the teachings of Mencius are found in the book bearing his name. Though this source contains considerable exposition on various Confucian themes, it does not contain a holistic, unified philosophical system. Indeed, not only is the Mencius almost entirely silent on metaphysical and cosmological issues, but when such concepts are used, they are presented in a unreflective manner. For example, when Mencius discusses material force (qi), he simply uses the term without defining or explaining it:

Your resolution is the commander of the qi. Qi is that which fills up the body. When your resolution is fixed somewhere, the qi sets up camp there. Hence, it is said, "Maintain your resolution. Do not injure the qi" (Mencius 2A:2. See also 6A:8).

This is also the case with his mentions of Heaven (Tian) and the Way (Dao). However, this should not be seen as a criticism of Mencius's scholarship, as these terms were used by virtually all the classical philosophers in a mutually consistent (and similarly undefined) way. Though he did not develop a metaphysical grounding for Confucian discourse, it should be noted that Mencius made another equally valuable contribution through his systematization and expansion of Confucian teachings into an detailed, idealistic ethical framework.

Ethics and personal cultivation

Mencius made two immeasurably-influential contributions to the Confucian worldview through his advocacy of two related concepts: the innate goodness of individuals and the ability of those individuals to reach sagehood through the cultivation of this virtue ("extending the good").

In the first case, Mencius suggested that each individual is born (endowed by Heaven (Tian)) with an inclination to do good. To demonstrate this, he uses various thought experiments, the most famous of which is imagining a small child falling into a well:

The reason why I say that humans all have hearts that are not unfeeling towards others is this. Suppose someone suddenly saw a child about to fall into a well: everyone in such a situation would have a feeling of alarm and compassion – not because one sought to get in good with the child's parents, not because one wanted fame among their neighbors and friends, and not because one would dislike the sound of the child's cries.
From this we can see that if one is without the heart of compassion, one is not a human (Mencius, 2A:6).

Further, he argues for the existence of four universal moral essences (benevolence, righteousness, ritual propriety, and wisdom) and suggests that these too are innate aspects of the human condition:

As for [people's] qing 情 [essence], "what they genuinely are," they can become good. This is what I mean by calling their natures good. As for their becoming not good, this is not the fault of their potential. Humans all have the heart of compassion. Humans all have the heart of disdain. Humans all have the heart of respect. Humans all have the heart of approval and disapproval. The heart of compassion is benevolence. The heart of disdain is righteousness. The heart of respect is propriety. The heart of approval and disapproval is wisdom. Benevolence, righteousness, propriety, and wisdom are not welded to us externally. We inherently have them. It is simply that we do not concentrate upon them. Hence, it is said, "Seek it and you will get it. Abandon it and you will lose it" (Mencius 6A:6).

This passage was a direct challenge to other philosophers of the day (specifically Moists and followers of Yang Zhu) who argued that Confucian moral cultivation went against the basics of human nature. By arguing for the innate virtue of human beings, Mencius moralized human discourse, as every individual (from the peasantry to the gentry) becomes valorized and equalized by their shared moral potentiality. At the same time, this also made moral cultivation a personal responsibility, as no one was inherently seen to lack the potential for sagehood. Another intriguing element of this system can be in the Mencian description of righteousness and propriety as innate virtues. These two terms refer to the mental attitudes that support and underlie the Confucian Five Relationships – righteousness, which encourages an individual to be appropriately deferential towards their parents and elders, and propriety, which encourages the proper observance of the rules of etiquette. Mencius's view that these were both in-born potentialities demonstrates how central these beliefs and attitudes were thought to be in the classical Chinese definition of human nature.

However, Mencius did not blindly argue for the actual goodness of people, as he openly acknowledged the evil and selfishness in the world. Instead, he suggested that that it was society's influence – its lack of a positive cultivating environment – that caused bad moral character (discussed below). As a result, it was the responsibility of each individual to cultivate the "sprouts" of their morality (a common Mencian theme), "extending the good" that they were each born with.

Among babes in arms there is none that does not know how to love its parents. When they grow older, there is none that does not know to respect its elder brother. Treating one's parents as parents is benevolence [ren]. Respecting one's elders is righteousness [yi]. There is nothing else to do but extend these to the world (Mencius 7A:15. See also 7B:31).

In this way, the Mencian path of moral cultivation becomes an exercise in extending "the reactions from the paradigmatic cases where we already have them to the relevantly similar cases where we do not yet have them but ought to" (van Norden, 112). By consciously and thoughtfully doing this, anyone is able to develop the moral excellence that they are born with.

Despite (or perhaps because of) this optimistic stance, Mencius found it necessary to address the presence of evil in the world. After a thoughtful examination, he became entirely convinced that any evil inherited by a person was due to environmental factors, with the most likely culprit being the social unrest created by immoral political leadership. He goes so far as to say that an immoral leader who prosecutes his subjects is guilty of entrapment, as their moral lapses are actually his fault:

The way according to which the people conduct their lives is this: If they have a secure livelihood, they will have a secure mind. And if they have no secure livelihood, they will not have a secure mind. And if they have no secure mind, there is nothing they will not do in the way of self-abandonment, moral deflection, depravity, and wild license. When they fall into crime, to pursue and punish them is to entrap them. How can such a thing as entrapping the people be allowed under the rule of a man of humanity [ren]? (Mencius 3A1, translated in Chan, 67).

Likewise, he argues that:

An enlightened ruler, in regulating the people's livelihood, must ensure that it is sufficient, on the one hand, to serve one's father and mother, and on the other hand, to nurture wife and children. In good years, one is always full. In years of famine, one escapes death. Only when the people have a regulated livelihood do they rush toward the good, and thus people follow the ruler easily (Mencius, 1A7).

Such convictions were instrumental in the development of Mencius's practical philosophy.

Practical Philosophy

The Mencian concern with moral cultivation and his confidence in the inherent goodness of people provided a strong impetus towards engaged scholarship. His convictions led to his belief that it was imperative for a scholar-official, like himself, to use his learning for the benefit of all people (from the ruling classes to the peasantry). As such, much of his thought and teaching centered upon fairly practical matters, including the need for proper governance, education and even land reforms. Mencius spent the greater part of his life attempting to convince various political leaders to enact these forward-thinking proposals.

Proper Governance

Due to the malleability of human nature, Mencius viewed proper governance as necessary for the moral advancement of the nation. Specifically, he thought that a ruler who acknowledged the innate kindness (ren) of his subjects would inherently draw the support of the people and would allow them to behave properly (following the rules of ritual propriety).

[King] Xuan said, "What must one's Virtue [de] be like so that one can become a king?"
Mengzi said, "One cares for the people and becomes a king. This is something that no one can stop."
…
Suppose Your Majesty were to bestow benevolence [ren] in governing. This would cause all under Heaven who serve others to all want to take their place in Your Majesty's court, those who plough to all want to plough in Your Majesty's uncultivated fields, merchants to all want to place their goods in Your Majesty's markets, those who travel to all wish to use Your Majesty's roads. All under Heaven who wish to complain of their rulers would all desire to report to Your Majesty. If it were like this, who could stop it?" (Mencius, 1A7).

In the above example, Mencius reproaches King Xuan for his failure to exercise benevolence in his leadership, a failure that was entirely within the King's ability to remedy. Further, he concludes the passage quoted above with viable suggestions (including offering public classes in animal husbandry and giving the people access to silk-producing moths) that would have appreciably improved the lives of the commoners, demonstrating his belief that this benevolent leadership was both practical and practicable.

Mencius thought that non-benevolent leadership produced an environment where personal moral cultivation was impossible. He was so commited to this proposition that he argued that it was acceptable for the populace to depose a tyrant who ignored the people's needs.

King Xuan of Qi asked, "Is it the case that Tang banished Jie, and that Wu struck down Zhou?"
Mengzi responded, saying, "There are such accounts in the historical records."
The King said, "Is it acceptable for subjects to kill their rulers?"
Mengzi said, "One who violates benevolence [ren] should be called a 'thief.' One who violates righteousness [yi] is called a 'mutilator.' A mutilator and thief is called a mere 'fellow.' I have heard of the execution of a mere fellow called 'Zhou,' but I have not heard of the killing of one's ruler" (Mencius 1B8).

Given his general commitment to the Confucian Five Relationships, such a teaching becomes additionally revolutionary, as it argues that a ruler who does not behave appropriately actually ceases to be a ruler. This idea paves the way for later debates about the reciprocal nature of the Confucian relationships.

Education

Just as the Mencian emphasis on human malleability necessitated that the proper environment be created by benevolent leadership, so too did it emphasize the necessity of proper education. He argues that "it is the way of people that if they are full of food, have warm clothes, and live in comfort, but are without instruction, then they come close to being animals. Sage-king Shun was anxious about this too, so he instructed Xie to be Minister of Instruction, and instruct them about human relations" (Mencius, 3A:4. See also 1A:7). The (fairly blatant) subtext here is that any ruler should share this concern, and should do everything in his/her power to make such an education available for their subjects.

This emphasis is also preserved in the idiomatic Chinese phrase 孟母三遷 (mèng mǔ sān qiān), which literally translated reads: "Mencius' mother, three moves." It refers to the legend that Mencius' mother moved their house three times—from beside a cemetery, to beside a marketplace, and finally beside a school—before finding a location that she felt was suitable for his up-bringing. As an expression, the idiom refers to the importance of a proper environment in raising children.

Land reforms

Finally, Mencius spoke frequently and highly of the "well-field system," a land reform plan that he thought would help provide for all members of the community and to foster a spirit of co-operation. More specifically, this system involved dividing a square plot of land into nine equal-sized squares, with the eight on the outside being privately owned and the one in the center belonging equally to each of the eight families. In farming this land, the peasants would first cooperate on their shared field, and, when work on it was complete, attend to their own plots. Defending the merits of such a scheme, Mencius argued that "in the fields of a district, those who belong to the same nine squares will render friendly service to one another in their going out an coming in, aid one another in keeping watch, and sustain one another in sickness. In this way, the people live in affection and harmony" (Mencius 3A:3, quoted in Chan, 68). This example is most interesting for providing a concrete instance of a practice that Mencius figured could "extend the good" in the real world.

Significance

Though Mencius considered himself to be a failure due to his inability to find an official patron to fully enact his political reforms, he has become one of the most influential figures in Chinese history. His impact on Chinese life and society has been second only to that of Confucius, as he was responsible for expanding and systematizing the teachings of his sagely idol. Indeed, the Mencian interpretation of Confucianism has generally been considered orthodoxy by subsequent Chinese philosophers, especially the Neo-Confucians of the Song dynasty. Specifically, Han Yu singled him out as the only classical era philosopher to correctly transmit the Confucian Dao, a view that was universally accepted among the Neo-Confucians. This public approbation reached its apex when Zhu Xi officially canonized his work as one of the Four Books, making it part of the official curriculum for Confucian education. Subsequently, Mencian ideas were central to the Neo-Confucian formulations of Wang Yang-ming, Muro Kyuso and Ogyu Sorai.

Many modern Confucians (including Kang Youwei, Xiong Shili and Xu Fuguan) see the Mencius as a means of addressing the Western challenges of democracy and human rights from within the classical Chinese corpus. Indeed, the Mencian doctrines of innate human goodness, of the malleability of human nature, and of the people's right to revolution continue to be intriguing and challenging, and are compatible with many of the beliefs of modern Western humanities and social sciences.

See also

• Chinese philosophy

References

ISBN links support NWE through referral fees

• Berthrong, John H. Transformations of the Confucian Way. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998. ISBN 0813328047
• Chan, Wing-tsit. "Idealistic Confucianism: Mencius. A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963. 49-83.
• Graham, A. C. Disputers of the TAO: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. Chicago, IL: Open Court, 1993. ISBN 0812690877
• "Mencius." With Introduction and Translation by Bryan W. van Norden. Included in Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy. New York: Seven Bridges Press, (2001, 111-155. ISBN 1889119091
• Schwartz, Benjamin. The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985. ISBN 0674961900

External links

All links retrieved November 8, 2022.

• English Translation of Mencius with comments by James Legge
• Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry
• Works by Mencius. Project Gutenberg

Credits

New World Encyclopedia writers and editors rewrote and completed the Wikipedia article in accordance with New World Encyclopedia standards. This article abides by terms of the Creative Commons CC-by-sa 3.0 License (CC-by-sa), which may be used and disseminated with proper attribution. Credit is due under the terms of this license that can reference both the New World Encyclopedia contributors and the selfless volunteer contributors of the Wikimedia Foundation. To cite this article click here for a list of acceptable citing formats.The history of earlier contributions by wikipedians is accessible to researchers here:

• Mencius  ^history

The history of this article since it was imported to New World Encyclopedia:

• History of "Mencius"

Note: Some restrictions may apply to use of individual images which are separately licensed.